The True Story of the Sale of the Island of Manhattan

Reading Time: 3 minutes 37 seconds

Manhattan is considered the cultural, financial, entertainment, and media capital of the world. The borough hosts the United Nations Headquarters as well as Wall Street. Many multinational media conglomerates reside in Manhattan, and it’s been the setting for many books, films, and tv shows. The value of the island of Manhattan, including all of its real estate, exceeds over three trillion dollars. Median residential property sales prices in Manhattan equals to $ 1,600 per square foot in 2018. Fifth Avenue, which also resides in Manhattan, commands the highest retail rents in the world, commanding a whopping $ 3,000 per square foot.

An often-repeated story throughout History is that the Dutch bought the island of Manhattan from the Native Americans. The price paid was $24 worth of beads, trinkets, a jar of Mayonnaise, two pair of wooden clogs, a loaf of wonder bread and a carton of Quaker oats. It is considered one of the biggest business mistakes in History. Here’s the thing did it really go down the way we were taught? Let us explore, shall we?

On May 4, 1626, Peter Minuit arrived in New Amsterdam (modern-day NYC) as the new director of the Dutch West India Company (DWIC). The Dutch West India Company was a charted company of Dutch Merchants. Its goal was to expand the Dutch trade reach globally. It dabbled in trading many goods, including participating in the Atlantic slave trade. Minuit had been sent to diversify the trade coming out of New Netherland (Modern-day New York), they traded in mostly animal pelts then. Minuit was authorized by the DWIC to settle any disputes with any local Native American tribes over trading and land rights. Soon after Minuit’s arrival, he agreed with a local tribe for the land rights to Manhattan. There is no proof of an original title deed. The only evidence we have is a DWIC internal communication from 1626. The communication states:

“Yesterday the ship the Arms of Amsterdam arrived here. It Sailed from New Netherland out of the River Mauritius on September 23. They report that our people are in good spirit and live in peace. The women also have borne some children here. They have purchased the Island of Manhattes from the savages for the value of 60 Guilders. It is 11,000 Morgens in size.”

A historian in 1846 calculated that 60 guilders were equivalent to $24 for that time. This $24 figure has been frozen in time and is where this part of the story originates. Modern historians have calculated that 60 guilders were equivalent to $951.08 in that time frame. Now $951 is much better than 24, but it’s still too low of a price for the whole island of Manhattan.

 

One thing the correspondence doesn’t cover is what Native American tribe or on whose behalf was a deal with Minuit made. Historian Nathaniel Benchley found that Minuit was dealing with the Canarsees, a Lenape tribe primarily located in south Brooklyn. For those of you who are familiar with New York Geography, south Brooklyn is not Manhattan far from it actually. Benchley claims that the Weckquaesgeeks, a closely related Wappinger tribe, actually occupied most of mid and Northern Manhattan. That’s great except Minuit made a deal with the Canarsees.

 

That explains the low price! Manhattan was never the Canarsees to sell away. They were traveling through Manhattan and was approached with an offer they couldn’t refuse. They were happy to agree to anything the Dutch proposed hell it wasn’t their land. The Canarsees happily took the goods which were more than just trinkets and beads and went back to Brooklyn.

To further emphasize this point, there was a series of bloody battles between the Wappinger tribes and the Dutch settlers during the early 1640s. It seems someone didn’t respect the “deed” that was signed in 1626. Before these battles and the Dutch encroachment, the Wappingers lived peacefully on Manhattan.

If you were wondering how Manhattan eventually became part of the U.S. A.. The English conquered New Netherland and renamed it New York in 1664. After being regained buy the Dutch it was ceded back to England in the Westminster Treaty of 1674. The U.S.A won it from the English with the win in the revolutionary war.

Mistakes Were Made

Often throughout History, we are taught inaccurate stories. Especially when the story makes Europeans look Smarter, more intelligent, and wiser than whatever minority or “savage” culture they were dealing with. This story turns that line of thinking on its head and shows it as a false construct.

The Dutch were the ones who made a mistake in this story. They never did their research or homework on who had the right claim to Manhattan. They probably just stopped the first Native Americans they saw and proposed a deal to them. The problem was those Native Americans were the Canarsees, and they didn’t have a claim to Manhattan. Sure the Dutch paid a low monetary price, but they paid a much higher price in bloodshed with the battles they had to fight with the Wappinger tribes over the actual ownership of Manhattan.

The native Americans were not as dumb or naïve as they are portrayed, and the Europeans are not as intelligent as they are portrayed; the truth is somewhere in the middle. This tale is one of many stories from the past, that has been whitewashed, and the real story is finally coming too light.

15 Replies to “The True Story of the Sale of the Island of Manhattan”

  1. Cecelia DeBolt says: Reply

    Very interesting.

  2. ESTHER CATHERINE STRAUCH says: Reply

    THE SITE OF THE “PURCHASE” OF MANHATTAN HAS A MEMORIAL ROCK IN MY HOMETOWN , INWOOD, NYC. IT IS IN INWOOD HILL PARK. GO WEST ON 215 ST AND WHEN YOU COME TO INDIAN ROAD TAKE A SMALL LEFT PAST THE PLAYGROUND AND IT IS PARALLEL TO THE IRISH FOOTBALL FIELD. WORTH A LOOK; INWOOD HILL PARK IS INCREDIBLE.

  3. Donato A Grella says: Reply

    Thankyoumthsnkyou,I’m 83 and it took this long for the truth to come to me..thankyou

  4. Hi there. I found your website by the use of Google while searching for a similar topic, your web site got here up. It appears good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks to visit then.

  5. Your style is very unique compared to other folks I’ve read stuff from.
    Thanks for posting if you have the means, Guess I am going to just book
    mark this page.

    Feel free to visit my blog post; FloraVDeliso

  6. Be careful. Some time ago (1950’s?) the State of New York put up these “historic” markers with no historic content. In Bronxville New York there was a bronze plaque memorializing the deed to Sunset Hill being transferred by Chief Gramatan. Total fake story. Removed.

  7. Well seems as tho the Natives need some serious life changing reparations .js

  8. Hi, besides the question of whether the natives who made the deal with the durch were entitled to sell the land, the Dutch made another mistake: They should have brought their $24 to a bank that paid them more than 5.6% annual interest for the next 365 years, rather than buying an overvalued piece of land. Here’s why: in 1991, al of the real estate in Manhattan was estimated to have a value of $50,000,000,000 – a quarter of which can be ascribed to the ground. Now, $24 plus compound annual interest of 5.6% would give you $12,500,000,000. Any interest higher than that would give you more. If such an investment was available for 365 years, then it was not exactly Peter Minuit who has outsmarted the natives….just the other way round: the Dutchman has bought the island at a way too high price, given its value in 1991. For the numbers, see Cecil Adams (1992):
    https://www.straightdope.com/21341886/how-much-would-the-24-paid-for-manhattan-be-worth-in-today-s-money

  9. America is on stolen indigenous native peoples land & built by enslaved humans.
    TRUTH !!!!!!

  10. Kalei Apana says: Reply

    Similar to Hawaiʻi. The more we try to educate others, the more we have to defend the knowledge our kūpuna taught us. Lucky for us, we know the truth and will continue to educate others of true history of Hawaiʻi. Long story short, Hawaiʻi is illegally occupied to this day.

  11. What is funny is that when I was in Jr. High School the true story of the sale was taught to my by the history teacher and again I was taught the same history/story in college by my college history professor. It seems amazing that when I ask my granddaughter, who is a freshman in high school about the story, she doesn’t even know about the Dutch settling the area, what a trading company was, or that we were initially under English rule. She can sure tell you about the Kardashians and who Oprah interviewed but is lacking the basic knowledge about American History.

    1. I had heard the story of the sale of Manhattan in seventh grade by my history teacher. It is good to hear what may be the actual circumstances. Mike, the fact that your daughter seems to know less about US history than the Kardashians is probably about normal for a teenager. It is possible that she does indeed remember historical facts but they are just not important to her as kids that age are looking forward in their lives, not backward. Look for a balance in her educational growth and her social growth. She’ll be fine as long as her grades are decent.

  12. […] people claim it was purchased for $24 worth of trinkets, while others say the Native Americans were simply offered beads and other […]

  13. You can certainly see your expertise within the article you write.
    The arena hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are
    not afraid to say how they believe. Always go
    after your heart.

Leave a Reply